Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Boston Red Sox. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. As there was no minor league season in 2020, there are some instances where no new information was gleaned about a player. Players whose write-ups have not been altered begin by telling you so. For the others, the blurb ends with an indication of where the player played in 2020, which in turn likely informed the changes to their report. As always, I’ve leaned more heavily on sources from outside the org than within for reasons of objectivity. Because outside scouts were not allowed at the alternate sites, I’ve primarily focused on data from there. Lastly, in effort to more clearly indicate relievers’ anticipated roles, you’ll see two reliever designations, both in lists and on The Board: MIRP, or multi-inning relief pitcher, and SIRP, or single-inning relief pitcher.
For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed, you can click here. For further explanation of Future Value’s merits and drawbacks, read Future Value.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It can be found here.
Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Jeter Downs | 22.5 | AA | 2B | 2022 | 50 |
2 | Triston Casas | 21.0 | A+ | 1B | 2023 | 50 |
3 | Bryan Mata | 21.7 | AA | MIRP | 2021 | 45+ |
4 | Gilberto Jimenez | 20.5 | A- | CF | 2023 | 45+ |
5 | Noah Song | 23.6 | A- | SP | 2023 | 45 |
6 | Tanner Houck | 24.5 | MLB | MIRP | 2021 | 45 |
7 | Jarren Duran | 24.4 | AA | CF | 2022 | 45 |
8 | Connor Seabold | 25.0 | AA | SP | 2021 | 45 |
9 | Bobby Dalbec | 25.5 | MLB | 3B | 2021 | 45 |
10 | Eduard Bazardo | 25.4 | AA | SIRP | 2021 | 40+ |
11 | Brayan Bello | 21.7 | A | SIRP | 2022 | 40+ |
12 | Jay Groome | 22.4 | A | SP | 2022 | 40+ |
13 | Thad Ward | 24.0 | A+ | MIRP | 2022 | 40+ |
14 | Aldo Ramirez | 19.7 | AAA | SP | 2023 | 40+ |
15 | Nick Yorke | 18.8 | R | 2B | 2025 | 40+ |
16 | Jeisson Rosario | 21.2 | A+ | CF | 2021 | 40+ |
17 | Brainer Bonaci | 18.5 | R | 3B | 2023 | 40 |
18 | Hudson Potts | 22.2 | AA | 3B | 2021 | 40 |
19 | Connor Wong | 24.6 | AA | C | 2021 | 40 |
20 | Eduardo Lopez | 18.7 | R | CF | 2023 | 40 |
21 | Blaze Jordan | 18.1 | R | 1B | 2025 | 40 |
22 | Juan Chacon | 18.1 | R | CF | 2024 | 40 |
23 | Cameron Cannon | 23.2 | A- | 2B | 2023 | 40 |
24 | Nick Decker | 21.3 | A- | RF | 2023 | 40 |
25 | Jacob Wallace | 22.4 | A- | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
26 | Brendan Cellucci | 22.5 | A- | SIRP | 2022 | 40 |
27 | Matthew Lugo | 19.7 | A- | SS | 2024 | 40 |
28 | Bryan Gonzalez | 19.3 | R | RF | 2024 | 40 |
29 | Garrett Whitlock | 24.6 | AA | MIRP | 2021 | 40 |
30 | Durbin Feltman | 23.7 | AA | SIRP | 2021 | 40 |
31 | Chih-Jung Liu | 21.8 | R | SIRP | 2024 | 40 |
32 | Jorge Rodriguez | 20.4 | A- | LHP | 2023 | 35+ |
33 | Christian Koss | 23.0 | R | SS | 2022 | 35+ |
34 | Eduardo Vaughan | 19.0 | R | RF | 2024 | 35+ |
35 | Andrew Politi | 24.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2022 | 35+ |
36 | Ryan Zeferjahn | 22.9 | A- | SIRP | 2022 | 35+ |
37 | Shane Drohan | 22.0 | R | SP | 2024 | 35+ |
38 | Bradley Blalock | 20.0 | R | SP | 2025 | 35+ |
39 | Naysbel Marcano | 18.6 | R | C | 2023 | 35+ |
40 | Marcus Wilson | 24.4 | AA | CF | 2021 | 35+ |
41 | Chris Murphy | 22.6 | A- | MIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
42 | Antoni Flores | 20.2 | A- | 3B | 2023 | 35+ |
43 | Luis Perales | 17.7 | R | RHP | 2025 | 35+ |
44 | Albert Feliz | 18.7 | R | LF | 2023 | 35+ |
45 | Jeremy Wu-Yelland | 21.5 | R | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
- All
- C
- 1B
- 2B
- SS
- 3B
- OF
- LF
- CF
- RF
- LHP
- RHP
50 FV Prospects
Age | 22.5 | Height | 5′ 11″ | Weight | 195 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 50 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
40/50 | 50/50 | 40/45 | 45/45 | 45/50 | 50 |
Last year, I projected Downs to be a second baseman based on how thick his lower body already was at age 21, and there are folks in the industry who still think that’s the case, but at the alternate site, I thought he looked agile enough to stay at short and be passable in the same way Xander Bogaerts kind of has been, especially on balls in play to his left and in on the grass. I think Downs can be positioned defensively so that he’s making most of his plays in that direction rather than having to go into the hole and backhand balls, which he’s less able to do. His average exit velo was 88 mph in 2019, and there’s not a lot of room on the body, so that might be all, but he strikes the ball hard and with consistency, and that’s typically enough to be an everyday player at one of the middle infield spots. (Alternate site)
Age | 21.0 | Height | 6′ 4″ | Weight | 252 | Bat / Thr | L / R | FV | 50 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
35/55 | 65/70 | 35/60 | 30/20 | 35/40 | 55 |
45+ FV Prospects
Age | 21.7 | Height | 6′ 3″ | Weight | 238 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 45+ |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Curveball | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
60/60 | 45/45 | 50/50 | 55/60 | 40/50 | 93-96 / 99 |
Mata resides in the 45+ FV tier for several of the same reasons that Adrian Morejon and Justus Sheffield have in the past: the shape of their fastball movement is not suited to missing bats, and they have a spotty command and/or injury track record. Even though Mata sat 93-96 as a starter in 2019, his fastball only generated a 6% swinging strike rate against mid-level hitters. His best two pitches for missing bats are his changeup followed by his well-located slider (the curveball has nastier movement but is an easy ID out of his hand due to its loopier shape). Mata’s release grew inconsistent later in his alt site outings and he’s not as good of an athlete as the typical starter. I think he’ll start for Boston but on a contending team, a guy like this comes out of the bullpen in a valuable multi-inning role. (Alternate site, was on the instructs roster but did not pitch in games)
Age | 20.5 | Height | 5′ 11″ | Weight | 212 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 45+ |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
35/60 | 45/50 | 30/40 | 70/70 | 50/60 | 60 |
The news of the added weight and strength is exciting because, while Jimenez was already a 45+ on last year’s writeup, he had little in-game power due to a very simple, opposite-field, slap-oriented approach, especially from the left side. There’s been a little bit of movement on that score, but scouts still describe his swing as “handsy” and unlikely to produce power as it’s currently constituted, again, especially from the left side. Both swings were previously concerning for several reasons (bat path, balance, varied lower half use) but it’s possible that, even without a mechanical overhaul, Jimenez’s increased physicality will enable him to hit for doubles power down both baselines and to the gaps, which would be perfectly suitable for both traditional and modern leadoff man archetypes so long as he has the requisite secondary skills. He has good natural feel for making contact thanks to impressive hand-eye coordination. And again, this is a plus-plus athlete with what the org thinks is plus-plus makeup, elite speed, and impact defense and arm strength. On top of all this, Jimenez led the college-heavy New York-Penn League in hitting as a 19-year-old primarily hitting left-handed, something he started doing just two years ago in Instructional League. He’ll likely be on this offseason’s Picks to Click and would have been on this offseason’s top 100 had he been able to show in games that the body change impacted the power output, or that he has a high-end feel for the strike zone. (Fall Instructional League)
45 FV Prospects
Age | 23.6 | Height | 6′ 4″ | Weight | 200 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 45 |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Curveball | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
55/60 | 50/55 | 50/55 | 40/45 | 40/50 | 93-95 / 99 |
However long it takes, Song still has among the highest ceilings in this system. He works fast and throws hard, up to 99 during Team USA’s late-2019 Premier12 scrimmages in Arizona, his slider is plus, and he will mix in the occasional knee-buckling rainbow curveball. He at least profiles in a high-leverage relief role given the current composition of his stuff and control, and perhaps more than that had he been put into the developmental pipeline more quickly. We can’t anticipate what’ll happen to his stuff because of the layoff. It’s tough to wrangle just how that affects Song’s standing as a prospect even if it doesn’t impact his talent level, which is rare. (At-home dev)
Age | 24.5 | Height | 6′ 5″ | Weight | 230 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 45 |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Splitter | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
55/55 | 55/60 | 40/45 | 45/50 | 91-94 / 96 |
Age | 24.4 | Height | 6′ 2″ | Weight | 200 | Bat / Thr | L / R | FV | 45 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
45/55 | 45/45 | 30/35 | 70/70 | 35/40 | 40 |
Still, let’s not forget Duran’s tools (he’s a 70 runner) nor the foundation of statistical performance he has laid dating back to college. Duran hit a career .294 at Long Beach State but produced almost no power and slipped to the seventh round. Then he torched short-season and Low-A ball after signing, and began 2019, his first full pro campaign, with a ridiculous .387/.456/.543 line at Hi-A. But after seeing him at the 2019 Futures Game, I thought there was a gap between his talent level and that of the typical Futures Gamer, to his detriment. He posted a middling Double-A line during the back half of 2019, and he was similarly underwhelming during an extended look in that season’s Fall League.
Despite his speed, Duran’s instincts in center field are still not good (though they’ve improved), and he relies on his speed to make up for what he lacks in off-the-bat feel and anticipation. It’s possible the swing change has unlocked the power necessary to make Duran a regular, but it’s also possible that it has de-stabilized his feel for contact. We won’t know until he’s generated a bigger statistical sample with the new cut. I have him in as a fourth or platoon outfielder, a 1.5-ish WAR type of player. (Alternate site, Liga de Béisbol)
Age | 25.0 | Height | 6′ 2″ | Weight | 190 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 45 |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Curveball | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
45/50 | 50/50 | 45/45 | 55/60 | 55/60 | 90-93 / 94 |
Seabold doesn’t throw all that hard but his fastball spins at an usually high rate for its velocity, and the pitch has flat angle and a spin axis commensurate with the modern, up-in-the-zone approach. The heater and the changeup, which has screwball action, are going to give hitters fits. Both of Seabold’s breaking balls are visually mediocre but he commands them pretty well, and they aren’t easy IDs out of his hand, especially for righty batters. I have him in as a 1.5-ish WAR starter now, and we’ll likely see him in the big leagues soon. (Alternate site)
Age | 25.5 | Height | 6′ 4″ | Weight | 225 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 45 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/30 | 70/70 | 50/55 | 40/40 | 50/55 | 70 |
40+ FV Prospects
Age | 25.4 | Height | 6′ 0″ | Weight | 165 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40+ |
---|
Fastball | Curveball | Splitter | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
55/60 | 70/70 | 45/50 | 30/35 | 94-96 / 98 |
Age | 21.7 | Height | 6′ 1″ | Weight | 170 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40+ |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
55/60 | 40/45 | 55/60 | 30/40 | 92-95 / 98 |
Age | 22.4 | Height | 6′ 5″ | Weight | 262 | Bat / Thr | L / L | FV | 40+ |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Curveball | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50/50 | 40/45 | 55/55 | 45/50 | 40/50 | 92-94 / 95 |
It’s frustrating that even after several years of intense interest, there’s a lot we don’t know about Groome. He’s still just 22 and hasn’t yet had the opportunity to refine his slider against hitters from other organizations. You can assume some of what we don’t know is hidden upside, but certainly most of what we do know is that this is a volatile prospect. His ceiling is higher than several players ahead of him on this list, but he’s a less certain bet to have big league utility. (Alternate site, Fall Instructional League)
Age | 24.0 | Height | 6′ 3″ | Weight | 185 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40+ |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Curveball | Changeup | Cutter | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
45/50 | 50/55 | 45/45 | 40/45 | 50/55 | 40/45 | 90-94 / 96 |
Age | 19.7 | Height | 6′ 0″ | Weight | 191 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40+ |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
45/50 | 45/50 | 45/55 | 35/60 | 90-95 / 96 |
Well, Ramirez started throwing harder. He was sitting 92-94 at Instructional League and was topping out at 96 without having lost any command, or having begun to overthrow his breaking ball, or anything of that nature. Changeup/command guys tend to outpace traditional projections and though the developmental setting could have allowed for a short-term velo bump that won’t hold over a long season (I have Aldo sitting 90-94 in 2019), Ramirez is still on track to be a pitcher similar to Seabold by the time his 40-man deadline arrives. (Fall Instructional League)
Age | 18.8 | Height | 6′ 0″ | Weight | 200 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40+ |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25/60 | 40/45 | 20/40 | 50/45 | 30/40 | 30 |
I had a 35+ FV on Yorke, pre-draft. The bulk of my in-person looks came during 2019 PG National and the Area Code Games. During that time, he looked like a polished bat who couldn’t play shortstop due to a lack of arm strength, perhaps a lingering effect of a labrum tear from Yorke’s sophomore year of high school that caused him to spend his junior year DH’ing and playing the outfield. His infield footwork, hands, and actions were all fine, but the arm strength was not, and if that continues, then at best he’ll be able to play second base, which is where I have him projected. That’s still a favorable place on the defensive spectrum and Yorke doesn’t even have to develop a ton of power to profile there so long as he truly has a plus bat that produces bushels of doubles. Indeed, several amateur scouting departments think he’ll easily be able to do that, and even the clubs that didn’t pick him think Yorke was one of the, if not the, most polished high school hitters on the West Coast in 2020.
Pro scouts’ looks in the Fall were not as strong. One noted to me that they did not see Yorke pull a ball in the air at all during Instructional League. He showed up to the Red Sox alt site looking a little heavier and less athletic than he did the summer before, which perhaps puts him on a trajectory to be a shift-aided second baseman, but he’s still young enough for variability in this regard and I’m told that what he looked like at the alt site was better than how he looked physically earlier in the spring. I was light on him before the draft, but still think $2.7 million was overzealous even though it facilitated overslot picks later. (Alternate site, Fall Instructional League)
Age | 21.2 | Height | 5′ 11″ | Weight | 191 | Bat / Thr | L / L | FV | 40+ |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
40/50 | 40/45 | 30/30 | 60/60 | 45/60 | 60 |
40 FV Prospects
Age | 18.5 | Height | 5′ 10″ | Weight | 164 | Bat / Thr | S / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25/55 | 45/50 | 20/40 | 40/30 | 30/45 | 70 |
Age | 22.2 | Height | 6′ 3″ | Weight | 220 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/35 | 70/70 | 45/50 | 40/40 | 40/45 | 55 |
Age | 24.6 | Height | 6′ 1″ | Weight | 180 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/35 | 50/50 | 40/45 | 50/50 | 45/50 | 50 |
Age | 18.7 | Height | 6′ 0″ | Weight | 187 | Bat / Thr | S / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25/55 | 40/50 | 20/40 | 55/55 | 45/60 | 55 |
Age | 18.1 | Height | 6′ 1″ | Weight | 220 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25/55 | 55/60 | 30/55 | 35/30 | 40/60 | 50 |
Age | 18.1 | Height | 6′ 2″ | Weight | 170 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/50 | 40/50 | 20/50 | 60/55 | 45/55 | 55 |
Age | 23.2 | Height | 5′ 10″ | Weight | 205 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
35/55 | 50/50 | 30/40 | 45/40 | 40/45 | 50 |
The cornerstone of his prospect assessment was on-field production, and now Cannon hasn’t had the opportunity to replicate it in pro ball. He wasn’t invited to the alternate site and garnered generally tepid reviews from scouts who saw him in the Fall. He remains a 40 FV but falls behind others in that tier. (Fall Instructional League)
Age | 21.3 | Height | 6′ 0″ | Weight | 207 | Bat / Thr | L / L | FV | 40 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/40 | 55/60 | 35/50 | 50/45 | 40/50 | 50 |
Age | 22.4 | Height | 6′ 1″ | Weight | 190 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
45/50 | 50/60 | 50/55 | 30/40 | 88-93 / 96 |
Age | 22.5 | Height | 6′ 4″ | Weight | 200 | Bat / Thr | L / L | FV | 40 |
---|
Fastball | Curveball | Splitter | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
60/60 | 60/60 | 45/50 | 20/35 | 94-96 / 97 |
Age | 19.7 | Height | 6′ 1″ | Weight | 187 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/45 | 40/50 | 30/40 | 55/55 | 45/50 | 55 |
Age | 19.3 | Height | 6′ 3″ | Weight | 220 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/45 | 50/60 | 25/55 | 40/30 | 35/45 | 45 |
Age | 24.6 | Height | 6′ 5″ | Weight | 190 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
50/50 | 50/55 | 45/50 | 50/55 | 92-95 / 96 |
Age | 23.7 | Height | 6′ 1″ | Weight | 208 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Curveball | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
55/60 | 55/55 | 45/50 | 35/40 | 92-95 / 96 |
Age | 21.8 | Height | 6′ 0″ | Weight | 185 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 40 |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Curveball | Splitter | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
40/60 | 50/60 | 40/45 | 45/55 | 30/40 | 93-96 / 98 |
But I’ve made no change to Liu’s FV. He slides down within the tier but is still a bounce-back 40 FV type who has shown three plus pitches in the past (fastball, slider, splitter). He also mixes in a curveball as a fourth pitch. (Fall Instructional League)
35+ FV Prospects
Age | 20.4 | Height | 5′ 11″ | Weight | 170 | Bat / Thr | L / L | FV | 35+ |
---|
Fastball | Curveball | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
40/50 | 45/50 | 45/55 | 35/55 | 89-91 / 93 |
Age | 23.0 | Height | 6′ 1″ | Weight | 182 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 35+ |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
35/55 | 45/45 | 30/45 | 50/50 | 40/45 | 50 |
Age | 19.0 | Height | 6′ 3″ | Weight | 180 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 35+ |
---|
Age | 24.6 | Height | 6′ 0″ | Weight | 191 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 35+ |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
55/55 | 50/55 | 45/50 | 30/40 | 92-95 / 96 |
Age | 22.9 | Height | 6′ 4″ | Weight | 209 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 35+ |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
55/60 | 50/55 | 40/45 | 30/45 | 94-96 / 98 |
Age | 22.0 | Height | 6′ 3″ | Weight | 195 | Bat / Thr | R / L | FV | 35+ |
---|
Fastball | Curveball | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
40/50 | 55/60 | 40/45 | 30/40 | 89-92 / 94 |
Age | 20.0 | Height | 6′ 2″ | Weight | 190 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 35+ |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Curveball | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
40/55 | 40/50 | 30/45 | 30/40 | 30/45 | 91-93 / 95 |
Age | 18.6 | Height | 6′ 0″ | Weight | 175 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 35+ |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/45 | 45/50 | 20/40 | 20/20 | 45/55 | 60 |
Age | 24.4 | Height | 6′ 3″ | Weight | 175 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 35+ |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/35 | 55/55 | 40/45 | 60/60 | 45/50 | 50 |
Age | 22.6 | Height | 6′ 1″ | Weight | 188 | Bat / Thr | L / L | FV | 35+ |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Curveball | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50/55 | 40/40 | 45/50 | 50/55 | 35/40 | 89-93 / 95 |
Age | 20.2 | Height | 6′ 1″ | Weight | 193 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 35+ |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/40 | 45/55 | 20/45 | 50/45 | 45/55 | 60 |
Age | 17.7 | Height | 6′ 1″ | Weight | 168 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 35+ |
---|
Fastball | Curveball | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
40/55 | 45/55 | 30/45 | 20/40 | null / 95 |
Age | 18.7 | Height | 6′ 2″ | Weight | 220 | Bat / Thr | R / R | FV | 35+ |
---|
Hit | Raw Power | Game Power | Run | Fielding | Throw |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/35 | 70/80 | 25/60 | 30/30 | 40/45 | 40 |
Age | 21.5 | Height | 6′ 2″ | Weight | 210 | Bat / Thr | L / L | FV | 35+ |
---|
Fastball | Slider | Changeup | Command | Sits/Tops |
---|---|---|---|---|
50/55 | 50/55 | 40/50 | 30/35 | 90-93 / 96 |
Other Prospects of Note
Pitching Depth Types
Brock Bell, RHP
Yusniel Padron-Artilles, RHP
Joan Martinez, RHP
Brian Van Belle, RHP
Alex Scherff, RHP
Bell’s fastball has carry and has been up to at least 95 (he sat 91-94 in 2019) and he has a good curveball that gets its depth from its axis rather than raw spin. Padron-Artilles, 23, was born in Cuba but drafted out of Miami-Dade College a couple of years ago. He also has a really sneaky fastball even though he doesn’t throw that hard. Martinez and Scherff have premium arm strength — Martinez is 94-97 touching 99, Scherff is 92-96 with a good changeup — but relief-only projections, and their fastballs don’t play like you’d expect given the velo. Van Belle (undrafted out of Miami) has a plus changeup and a chance to be a spot starter.
Young Sleepers
Wilkelman Gonzalez, RHP
Ceddanne Rafaela, SS
Darel Belen, RF
Ricardo Cubillan, SS
Nathanael Cruz, RHP
Kelvin Diaz, CF
Jhostynxon Garcia, RF
Gonzalez is 6-foot-3 and has already touched 95 at age 18. He had some support for the main section of the list after his 2020 instructs performance. Rafaela has contact skills and can play all over the field. He’s 17, but is only 5-foot-8 and has very little room on the frame. Belen is the opposite. He’s a broad-shouldered power projection bat at 6-foot-4, with average raw, and a plus arm, another right field look. Cubillan was hurt for much of 2019. He’s 22 and plays a good short and has contact skills, but very little power. Cruz is somewhat advanced for a 17-year old pitcher. He’s in the low-90s with fringe secondary stuff right now. Diaz was a shortstop but moved to center field; he’s another wiry frame to keep an eye on in case he grows into impact power. Garcia has similar tools but a slighter build.
Frames with Power
Pedro Castellanos, 1B
Mario Campana, RF
Tyler Esplin, RF
Brandon Howlett, 3B
This is a self-explanatory group. All have very high offensive bars to clear at their respective positions.
System Overview
This system is not very good because it still lacks the top end prospects that drive the empirically-derived farm rankings here at the site. But it is about 10 prospects deeper than last year’s list as the Red Sox were 2020 sellers at the onset of a rebuild that was partly ownership-imposed and partly caused by the unsustainable way Dave Dombrowski ran the show.
Boston’s 2020 was the rebuild equivalent of a sprinter made of molasses coming out of the blocks. Part of this is because the most talented part of the Betts trade, Alex Verdugo, is no longer a prospect, part of it is because Boston had no second rounder in 2020 because of their sign-stealing scandal, and part of it is because the young Latin American core of this system didn’t really have a chance to get a traditional year of development and evaluation.
Some of it is also, at least at this website, because I didn’t like their draft. I watched film (some from last summer and some from the alt site), talked to pro scouts who saw Nick Yorke after the draft, and doubled back to some crosscheckers on the West Coast who saw him before it. Their opinions were enough to move my pre-draft evaluation of him pretty considerably, but their class still feels sub-par to me. I’m not keen on positionless hitters, and the Red Sox may have drafted two of them. The shortened draft also punished Boston and other teams with thin farm systems, and made it impossible to find late-round diamonds in the rough like Boston did with Blalock and Cellucci in 2019. They did sign more undrafted free agents than other clubs, which makes sense considering the state of this system, though it’s also confirmation that the org is aware it needs more talent.
It’s fairly likely that whoever the Red Sox draft fourth overall in the 2021 Draft will immediately become their top prospect, and rumors of an Andrew Benintendi trade may yet cause this list to grow before the end of the offseason. It’d be smart if Boston flexed its financial might to take on some bad contracts (with prospects attached, of course) while other teams are especially desperate to get rid of them, but it doesn’t seem like ownership would allow that.
Read More