The Official ZiPS 2020 Projected Standings
Projecting such a season presents some unique challenges a prognosticator doesn’t normally face. It’s not projecting the individual players’ production that’s the problem so much as all the stuff around it. How many players will miss time due to the league’s COVID-19 protocols? How do we adjust for injuries when teams will play just 37% of the games, but players’ recovery from hamstring and elbow woes won’t be similarly prorated? Will top prospect talent have the same short-term upside when they’re riding the bench or practicing at their team’s alternate site that they would if they were playing actual games in the minors? How will the strange, crowdless games and the stresses of keeping up social distancing guidelines affect play?
Because MLB and the MLBPA have reportedly decided to revisit the seemingly abandoned playoff expansion for this season, just a day before the start of the season, these may not be the final final projections. Once more unto the breach.
| Team | W | L | GB | PCT | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | No. 1 Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York Yankees | 37 | 23 | — | .617 | 44.8% | 20.8% | 65.6% | 8.8% | 0.0% |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 35 | 25 | 2 | .583 | 34.8% | 22.5% | 57.3% | 6.9% | 0.1% |
| Boston Red Sox | 30 | 30 | 7 | .500 | 14.5% | 18.6% | 33.1% | 2.9% | 0.7% |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 27 | 33 | 10 | .450 | 5.6% | 10.9% | 16.4% | 1.1% | 3.6% |
| Baltimore Orioles | 20 | 40 | 17 | .333 | 0.4% | 1.1% | 1.5% | 0.1% | 24.7% |
Gerrit Cole is a gigantic upgrade for the Yankees, but in a 60-game season, it’s hard to find too much daylight between New York and a team as deep as the Tampa Bay Rays. The team is helped by getting most of its roster healthy for the start of the season — Luis Severino obviously excluded — but it still loses a massive chunk off its playoff probability due to the volatility of a short season and the slightly tougher schedule that coastal teams are projected to get compared to the central teams. That doesn’t matter so much for divisional standings, but it certainly does for the Wild Cards.
It still feels jarring to see the Orioles with a 1.5% chance of making the playoffs, but we don’t have a lot of experience with seasons this short; our brains just aren’t tuned that way. They’re still a long shot, but I’m all for something preposterous happening.
| Team | W | L | GB | PCT | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | No. 1 Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Twins | 35 | 25 | — | .583 | 40.1% | 17.6% | 57.7% | 7.0% | 0.1% |
| Cleveland Indians | 34 | 26 | 1 | .567 | 32.1% | 18.2% | 50.3% | 5.6% | 0.1% |
| Chicago White Sox | 31 | 29 | 4 | .517 | 19.6% | 16.8% | 36.4% | 3.4% | 0.6% |
| Kansas City Royals | 26 | 34 | 9 | .433 | 5.9% | 8.6% | 14.5% | 1.0% | 4.5% |
| Detroit Tigers | 23 | 37 | 12 | .383 | 2.4% | 3.9% | 6.3% | 0.4% | 11.3% |
The White Sox do take a hit with Michael Kopech electing to opt-out, but it’s a rather small one. That’s not to say his upside isn’t tremendous (though his downside it, too), but adding Dallas Keuchel and Gio Gonzalez significantly improved the depth of the rotation from last season. Carlos Rodon isn’t really an addition in the strictest sense, but getting him back from Tommy John basically has the same effect.
The shorter season helps the Sox, but it also makes the Royals and Tigers considerably more viable in terms of their postseason competitiveness. The Royals aren’t a remotely “good” team, but deciding not to move all their talent during their rebuild does give them a short-term benefit, even if I think it hurts the team long-term. Hanging onto Whit Merrifield and Jorge Soler helps a lot when you only need to beat the competition for two months.
The Tigers still have a lousy offense, but even before adding Jonathan Schoop and C.J. Cron, they’d have been hard-pressed to match last year’s level of incompetence, and there’s legitimate upside in their pitching.
| Team | W | L | GB | PCT | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | No. 1 Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston Astros | 35 | 25 | — | .583 | 43.9% | 15.9% | 59.8% | 7.5% | 0.1% |
| Oakland A’s | 33 | 27 | 2 | .550 | 30.4% | 17.8% | 48.2% | 5.2% | 0.2% |
| Los Angeles Angels | 30 | 30 | 5 | .500 | 15.8% | 14.4% | 30.2% | 2.6% | 1.0% |
| Texas Rangers | 28 | 32 | 7 | .467 | 8.4% | 10.3% | 18.7% | 1.4% | 3.0% |
| Seattle Mariners | 22 | 38 | 13 | .367 | 1.5% | 2.5% | 4.0% | 0.2% | 15.5% |
I suppose in means there’s some small bit of justice in the world that the Astros will go into 2020 with a less comfortable grip on the AL West than in past seasons. Their edge over the Oakland A’s is paper-thin, and an injury or two in the rotation might be all it takes to send the team’s pitching careening into a tailspin. The A’s have their own injury problems, of course, but most of this year’s projected rotation was injured or suspended for parts of last year, so they’re used to having to fill-in around those players.
Los Angeles and Texas both have serious holes, but they’re also close enough to .500 to be dangerous under the right conditions. I’m sure the Angels were holding their collective breath about whether Mike Trout would opt-out of the 2020 season — it’s hard to see a lot of playoff paths without him in the lineup, even in a season where his 2.9 projected WAR is enough to lead the league.
| Team | W | L | GB | PCT | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | No. 1 Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington Nationals | 34 | 26 | — | .567 | 34.6% | 17.8% | 52.4% | 5.4% | 0.1% |
| Atlanta Braves | 33 | 27 | 1 | .550 | 32.4% | 17.9% | 50.3% | 5.0% | 0.1% |
| New York Mets | 31 | 29 | 3 | .517 | 18.7% | 16.2% | 34.9% | 2.9% | 0.7% |
| Philadelphia Phillies | 28 | 32 | 6 | .467 | 10.6% | 12.6% | 23.3% | 1.6% | 2.3% |
| Miami Marlins | 25 | 35 | 9 | .417 | 3.7% | 5.7% | 9.4% | 0.5% | 8.0% |
With Yasiel Puig‘s contract falling apart after he contracted COVID-19, the Braves gave back the small fraction of a win that had edged them over the Nationals in the standings. As can be seen in the divisional probabilities, that one-game projection is just about nothing. What is definitely not nothing is Marcus Stroman‘s calf injury. The Mets had picked up a game since the last ZiPS run from small adjustments in their relative strength of schedule (and the Braves slightly weakening), but lost it again thanks to Stroman’s injury. Given that the injury just happened, I’m assuming at this time that he’ll only be out for a month. If he’s out for the season, which is certainly possible, you can subtract another win here.
The Marlins are one of the more fascinating teams in this shortened season. The rotation has interesting upside, enough that the teams could be, well, if not dangerous, then dangerousish, at least if they get some offensive production, which is far from guaranteed.
| Team | W | L | GB | PCT | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | No. 1 Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Cubs | 32 | 28 | — | .533 | 27.4% | 14.5% | 41.9% | 3.8% | 0.4% |
| Milwaukee Brewers | 31 | 29 | 1 | .517 | 22.7% | 13.8% | 36.6% | 3.1% | 0.7% |
| St. Louis Cardinals | 31 | 29 | 1 | .517 | 22.1% | 13.9% | 36.0% | 3.1% | 0.8% |
| Cincinnati Reds | 31 | 29 | 1 | .517 | 21.5% | 13.7% | 35.2% | 3.0% | 0.8% |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | 26 | 34 | 6 | .433 | 6.3% | 6.9% | 13.2% | 0.8% | 5.9% |
I’m kinda disappointed that the Blue Jays aren’t going to be playing their games at PNC Park. I made them a hat and everything!
The NL Central remains the favorite to be the most wide-open division in baseball. There’s no team that has the appearance of a juggernaut, and each roster has a significant hole or two, which makes race-watching fun. I picked the Reds in our staff predictions that will run later today, but I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised to see any of the other non-Pittsburgh teams take the division. ZiPS gives the Cubs a slight edge, but just look how close everyone is to 25%! Well, everyone except the Pirates.
| Team | W | L | GB | PCT | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | No. 1 Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Dodgers | 38 | 22 | — | .633 | 56.6% | 15.3% | 72.0% | 9.3% | 0.0% |
| San Diego Padres | 32 | 28 | 6 | .533 | 22.5% | 20.4% | 42.9% | 3.8% | 0.3% |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | 30 | 30 | 8 | .500 | 12.8% | 16.3% | 29.1% | 2.2% | 1.4% |
| Colorado Rockies | 26 | 34 | 12 | .433 | 4.9% | 8.8% | 13.7% | 0.8% | 5.0% |
| San Francisco Giants | 26 | 34 | 12 | .433 | 3.2% | 6.2% | 9.3% | 0.5% | 8.0% |
A 60-game season means that none of the divisions are likely to be laughers, but the Dodgers probably have the easiest path. ZiPS likes the Padres for a second year in a row, even though 2019 did not work out as well as the computer hoped. My non-statistical concern for the Padres, going back to one of my questions at the top, is just how much short-term upside a Mackenzie Gore-type has if he’s not playing in minor league games.
ZiPS projects the Rockies and Giants to have the same win total, but sees much more upside for Colorado than San Francisco, as can be seen in the divisional/Wild Card probabilities. Simply put, the Rockies have some actual stars on the roster, which the Giants don’t, and that goes a long way when it comes to having positive (if still unlikely) outcomes. I have no real faith that the Rockies know how to find secondary talent that is above replacement level (Chris Owings! Matt Kemp!), but it’s at least possible.
With ZiPS out of the way, all that is left is for someone to officially say “Play ball!” Make sure to join us for our Opening Day chats this evening once they do.